Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate, by means of pull-out test, the bond strength of fiberglass posts when cemented with different lengths in endodontically treated teeth. and 55C). The pull-out test was performed on a universal screening machine (EMIC – DL500) SERPINA3 and the values obtained were statistically analyzed by analysis of variance (one-factor ANOVA) and multiple comparison test of Tukey, with level of significance of 5%. Results: The mean values standard deviation in Newtons (N) were: Group 1 = 120.5 (42.8) A, Group 2 = 103.1 (31.2) AB, Group 3 = 41.2 (22.4) C, < 0.005. Conclusion: The preparation of ? of remaining root appears to be a viable option when 2/3 of the preparation of the remaining root is not possible, but more results are needed for clinical validation. studies have demonstrated that reducing the length can be compensated using cements reinforced with resin.8 The technique of using fiberglass post associated with adhesive restorative materials can promote a long clinical success for endodonticaly treated teeth.9 Many published studies have evaluated intraradical bond strength associated with resin cements and adhesive systems.10-18 Few studies made an attempt to evaluate the 873436-91-0 technique of this procedure. So far, the standard removal process flue is usually 2/3 of root length, however, some teeth are contraindicated because of their anatomy and root diameter. 19-21 The aim of this study was to evaluate by pull-out test, the bond strength of fiberglass posts cemented with different lengths in endodontically teeth. Materials and Methods A total of 60 bovine incisors with comparable lengths and diameters were selected. Using diamond disc (K Sorensen, Barueri, Brazil) in the straight hand piece, the teeth were sectioned at cementoenamel junction standardizing root length in 21 mm, and the crowns were discarded. The roots were fixed at the tip 873436-91-0 a paralelometer (Bio Art, S?o Carlos, SP, Brazil) by the aid of a godiva stick by the center of PVC connection embedded with chemically activated acrylic resin until complete polymerization of the resin. The roots received endodontic treatment standardizing the length of 21 mm at all. It was used Kerr files (Dentsply Maillefer, Switzerland) until number 60 and concurrent irrigation with 1% sodium hypochlorite. The specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups (= 20) and after 24 h of desobturation with the drill guideline (post no 3. Exacto/Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil) as follows: Group 1: Removal process with 2/3 of the length = 14 mm Group 2: Removal process with ? of the length = 10.5 mm and Group 3: Removal procedure with ? of the length = 5.25 mm. After the division of the groups the posts 873436-91-0 were disinfected with 70% alcohol and ducts cleaned with sodium hypochlorite 1%, saline answer and dried with absorbent paper cones (Tanari Industrial Manaus, Brazil). The cement used was RelyX U200 (3M ESPE – USA) which was dispensed on a block of paper, spatulate and inserted into the canal with the aid of a Centrix syringe with needle suggestions according to manufacturers instructions. The posts were inserted the excess od resin cement was removed with an explorer probe and light curing for 40 s (Optilight LD Maximum – Gnatus). The specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10.000 cycles/30 s/3 s/5C and 55C) (Nova Etica, Model 521-E, Ethics Scientific Equipment S/A, S?o Paulo – SP, Brazil). The number of cycles corresponded to 12 months aging. 22 After thermocycling it was made loops on the end of the device for Pull-out test. It was made a hole with a 2200 diamond bur (KG Sorensen) at high speed and thoroughly it inserted stainless steel wire coated for nylon. Then, a reinforcement of chemically activated resin was situated at the end of the device to minimize possible disruption effect of tensioning before the pull-out test. The pull-out test was carried out on a universal screening machine (EMIC – DL500) at a velocity of 0.5 mm/s until the total traction of the fiberglass post, and the results were statistically evaluated. Two pins Group 2 and two pins Group 3 come loose after thermocycling, and some posts broke during the test. Finally, for statistical analysis, these samples were discarded, and the final number of samples for each group was: Group 1: = 13, Group 2: = 17 and Group 3: = 17. The results were analyzed using analysis of variance (one-factor ANOVA) test and Multiple Comparison Test of Tukey at a significance level of 5%. Results The results are explained in Table 1. Table 1 Mean valuesstandard deviation for bond strength (Newtons) for each experimental group. Using Tukeys test, it was.