The mechanisms by which the contracting myocardium exerts extravascular forces (intramyocardial pressure, IMP) on coronary blood vessels and by which it affects the coronary flow remain incompletely understood. intramyocyte pressure provides good agreement with the majority of measurements. These findings have important implications for elucidating the physical basis of IMP and for understanding coronary phasic flow and coronary artery and microcirculatory disease. and website], rather than being evaluated from a combined heart-vessel model, were adopted from measured data, this in view of inevitable approximations required in such a complex model and the likewise inevitable need to adjust the model parameters to fit the data. Fig. 1. Block diagram of the simulation platform. The main blocks CSF2 are anatomic reconstruction (and should vanish, i.e., denotes the intravascular pressure in each of the three vessels comprising the is the bifurcation pressure. The vessel hydraulic resistance ? is calculated from Poiseuille’s law, i.e., and on the MVI-dependent extravascular loading, as described below. Mass conservation was implemented into the vessel model, and the resulting equation (Appendix C) was applied in flow analysis of the entire network, subject to given boundary conditions (Online Data Supplement I). MVI Mechanisms Three different interaction mechanisms and two of their combinations were examined. Varying elasticity. Contractility is taken to affect coronary flow through activation-dependent changes of myocardial stiffness (67). To analyze the effect of varying elasticity (VE) alone, we modeled the myocardium as a hyperelastic solid and ignored the effects of LV cavity pressure (LVP; see Online Data Supplement I) and associated extracellular (interstitial) pressure (Fig. 4and and (at HR = 120 beats/min and PA = 120/90 mmHg) were 460 and 0.15, respectively, under no MVI and no autoregulation, and 50 and 0.15, respectively, under CEP + SIP and tone regulation, thus justifying the above assumptions. As commonly used, flow was assumed to be fully developed, which may not always be the case in networks with short internodal distances (75). This assumption may lead to 15291-77-7 IC50 underestimation of vessel resistances (75). The study conclusions are expected to be unaffected by this assumption, since all tested mechanisms were 15291-77-7 IC50 based on this same assumption and are therefore likely to be similarly affected. Furthermore, comparison with the data was based mostly on qualitative trends rather than on exact numerical fit. and (defined as the ratio between loaded and unloaded lengths; see below) and transluminal pressures P. The model equations are presented below, followed by analysis of the vessel and myocardium reference configurations. Model Equations Kinematics. The axisymmetric mappings between each pair of configurations and (Fig. 3) in cylindrical coordinates is ( (is the cylinder length, and the stretch ratio = of each material (vessel wall and myocardium; see below) via the hyperelastic relationship T = ?PI + F(?vanish. The radial force equilibrium equation is ?+ (? = 0. By applying the axial and radial equilibrium equations, the external axial force Fand the transluminal pressure P can be expressed in terms of the components of the tissue stress tensor T as follows (25): was taken to remain constant during this mapping. Untethered configuration. Unloaded coronary vessels are not 15291-77-7 IC50 stress free. When myocardial tethering is removed, large epicardial arteries were found to shorten by 0% in human ex vivo (24) and 40% in swine (69). The untethered configuration was obtained by mapping from the tethered unloaded configuration (Fig. 3and were used to evaluate the dependence of vessel diameter on the cast value = (Fig. 2, and Qoutand Poutdenote vessel inlet and outlet pressures, respectively. The hydraulic capacitance, extends the common definition of capacity in nonlinear intramyocardial pump models (e.g., Refs. 6, 27), can be combined with nonlinear ordinary differential equations.